                                                                                                            <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Personal Finance Magazines Relevant?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pfadvice.com/2006/03/03/are-personal-finance-magazines-relevant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pfadvice.com/2006/03/03/are-personal-finance-magazines-relevant/</link>
	<description>Bridging the gap between saving money and investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:42:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The IRAte Investor &#187; Weekly Links, March 4, 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.pfadvice.com/2006/03/03/are-personal-finance-magazines-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>The IRAte Investor &#187; Weekly Links, March 4, 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 08:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pfadvice.com/2006/03/03/are-personal-finance-magazines-relevant/#comment-958</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeffrey offers a take on Jim Cramer&#039;s Mad Money Bad Advice, which doubles as a good argument for index funds, and asks Are Personal Finance Magazines Relevant?. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeffrey offers a take on Jim Cramer&#8217;s Mad Money Bad Advice, which doubles as a good argument for index funds, and asks Are Personal Finance Magazines Relevant?. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbhunter</title>
		<link>http://www.pfadvice.com/2006/03/03/are-personal-finance-magazines-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>mbhunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 07:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pfadvice.com/2006/03/03/are-personal-finance-magazines-relevant/#comment-956</guid>
		<description>That, and how often do you hear them talking about short-selling?  There are many more buy recommendations than sell recommendations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That, and how often do you hear them talking about short-selling?  There are many more buy recommendations than sell recommendations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.pfadvice.com/2006/03/03/are-personal-finance-magazines-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-952</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 02:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pfadvice.com/2006/03/03/are-personal-finance-magazines-relevant/#comment-952</guid>
		<description>Begin outdated would require that they were ever in-dated.  I subscribe to Kiplinger&#039;s.  Most of the articles are either (1) a basic description of something (e.g., IRA, annutity) wrapped with a personal interest story or (2) &quot;The X widgets/things you need to get/do for Year&quot;.  

The basic problem is a conflict of interest.  Should we really expect them to write articles like, &quot;You know that big ad for Fidelity on the inside cover?  Well, ignore it, because actively managed funds are bad and Fidelity has higher expenses than Vanguard&quot;.  Half the copy of the magazine is recommendations for either individual stocks or actively-managed funds, neither of which most of their subscribers can effectively invest with.   I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Begin outdated would require that they were ever in-dated.  I subscribe to Kiplinger&#8217;s.  Most of the articles are either (1) a basic description of something (e.g., IRA, annutity) wrapped with a personal interest story or (2) &#8220;The X widgets/things you need to get/do for Year&#8221;.  </p>
<p>The basic problem is a conflict of interest.  Should we really expect them to write articles like, &#8220;You know that big ad for Fidelity on the inside cover?  Well, ignore it, because actively managed funds are bad and Fidelity has higher expenses than Vanguard&#8221;.  Half the copy of the magazine is recommendations for either individual stocks or actively-managed funds, neither of which most of their subscribers can effectively invest with.   I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~Dawn</title>
		<link>http://www.pfadvice.com/2006/03/03/are-personal-finance-magazines-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>~Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 01:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pfadvice.com/2006/03/03/are-personal-finance-magazines-relevant/#comment-951</guid>
		<description>Personal finance magazines need to get into communicating how to save money and live within means to the younger generation. Whether that is a magazine or regular articles in &#039;teen&#039; magazines or supporting school curriculum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personal finance magazines need to get into communicating how to save money and live within means to the younger generation. Whether that is a magazine or regular articles in &#8216;teen&#8217; magazines or supporting school curriculum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

